35fe41359d
Extending the tests for signature bias. E.g. biased signature generations that choose s' as min(s, q-s) because of signature malleability will not be detected. Such implementations exist: https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/023.pdf Removing test vectors in the tests. These test vectors are no longer necessary, since there are more test vectors in the JSON files. Additionally, the test vectors here are old and have not been updated. Replacing comparisons for test vector version with comparisons for the JSON schema. A new schema (with a different name) will be used whenever the format of the test vectors changes without backwards compatibility. Hence the JSON schema should change less frequently than the version and give a better indication whether test vectors and test match. Reducing the log size a bit. Bugs: b/33190860: default key size for DSA is now 2048. This has been fixed by Oracle. NOKEYCHECK=True PiperOrigin-RevId: 232647129 GitOrigin-RevId: 76f43890f0115a2ff72c6078a3376a96882a1504
410 lines
16 KiB
Java
410 lines
16 KiB
Java
/**
|
|
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
* You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
*
|
|
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
*
|
|
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
|
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
|
* limitations under the License.
|
|
*/
|
|
package com.google.security.wycheproof;
|
|
|
|
import static org.junit.Assert.assertTrue;
|
|
import static org.junit.Assert.fail;
|
|
|
|
import com.google.security.wycheproof.WycheproofRunner.ProviderType;
|
|
import com.google.security.wycheproof.WycheproofRunner.SlowTest;
|
|
import java.lang.management.ManagementFactory;
|
|
import java.lang.management.ThreadMXBean;
|
|
import java.math.BigInteger;
|
|
import java.security.InvalidAlgorithmParameterException;
|
|
import java.security.KeyPair;
|
|
import java.security.KeyPairGenerator;
|
|
import java.security.MessageDigest;
|
|
import java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException;
|
|
import java.security.Signature;
|
|
import java.security.interfaces.ECPrivateKey;
|
|
import java.security.interfaces.ECPublicKey;
|
|
import java.security.spec.ECGenParameterSpec;
|
|
import java.security.spec.ECParameterSpec;
|
|
import java.util.Arrays;
|
|
import org.junit.Test;
|
|
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
|
|
import org.junit.runners.JUnit4;
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Tests ECDSA signatures.
|
|
*
|
|
* <p>Tests for signature verification with test vectors are in JsonSignatureTest.java toghether
|
|
* with other signature schemes.
|
|
*
|
|
* @author bleichen@google.com (Daniel Bleichenbacher)
|
|
*/
|
|
@RunWith(JUnit4.class)
|
|
public class EcdsaTest {
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Determines the Hash name from the ECDSA algorithm. There is a small inconsistency in the naming
|
|
* of algorithms. The Oracle standard use no hyphen in SHA256WithECDSA but uses a hyphen in the
|
|
* message digest, i.e., SHA-256.
|
|
*/
|
|
private String getHashAlgorithm(String ecdsaAlgorithm) {
|
|
ecdsaAlgorithm = ecdsaAlgorithm.toUpperCase();
|
|
int idx = ecdsaAlgorithm.indexOf("WITH");
|
|
if (idx > 0) {
|
|
if (ecdsaAlgorithm.startsWith("SHA")) {
|
|
return "SHA-" + ecdsaAlgorithm.substring(3, idx);
|
|
} else {
|
|
return ecdsaAlgorithm.substring(0, idx);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return "";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Extract the integer r from an ECDSA signature. This method implicitely assumes that the ECDSA
|
|
* signature is DER encoded. and that the order of the curve is smaller than 2^1024.
|
|
*/
|
|
BigInteger extractR(byte[] signature) throws Exception {
|
|
int startR = (signature[1] & 0x80) != 0 ? 3 : 2;
|
|
int lengthR = signature[startR + 1];
|
|
return new BigInteger(Arrays.copyOfRange(signature, startR + 2, startR + 2 + lengthR));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
BigInteger extractS(byte[] signature) throws Exception {
|
|
int startR = (signature[1] & 0x80) != 0 ? 3 : 2;
|
|
int lengthR = signature[startR + 1];
|
|
int startS = startR + 2 + lengthR;
|
|
int lengthS = signature[startS + 1];
|
|
return new BigInteger(Arrays.copyOfRange(signature, startS + 2, startS + 2 + lengthS));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Extract the k that was used to sign the signature. */
|
|
BigInteger extractK(byte[] signature, BigInteger h, ECPrivateKey priv) throws Exception {
|
|
BigInteger x = priv.getS();
|
|
BigInteger n = priv.getParams().getOrder();
|
|
BigInteger r = extractR(signature);
|
|
BigInteger s = extractS(signature);
|
|
BigInteger k = x.multiply(r).add(h).multiply(s.modInverse(n)).mod(n);
|
|
return k;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Computes the bias of samples as
|
|
*
|
|
* abs(sum(e^(2 pi i s m / modulus) for s in samples) / sqrt(samples.length).
|
|
*
|
|
* If the samples are taken from a uniform distribution in the range 0 .. modulus - 1
|
|
* and the number of samples is significantly larger than L^2
|
|
* then the probability that the result is larger than L is approximately e^(-L^2).
|
|
* The approximation can be derived from the assumption that samples taken from
|
|
* a uniform distribution give a result that approximates a standard complex normal
|
|
* distribution Z. I.e. Z has a density f_Z(z) = exp(-abs(z)^2) / pi.
|
|
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_normal_distribution
|
|
*/
|
|
double bias(BigInteger[] samples, BigInteger modulus, BigInteger m) {
|
|
double sumReal = 0.0;
|
|
double sumImag = 0.0;
|
|
for (BigInteger s : samples) {
|
|
BigInteger r = s.multiply(m).mod(modulus);
|
|
// multiplier = 2 * pi / 2^52
|
|
double multiplier = 1.3951473992034527e-15;
|
|
// computes the quotent 2 * pi * r / modulus
|
|
double quot = r.shiftLeft(52).divide(modulus).doubleValue() * multiplier;
|
|
sumReal += Math.cos(quot);
|
|
sumImag += Math.sin(quot);
|
|
}
|
|
return Math.sqrt((sumReal * sumReal + sumImag * sumImag) / samples.length);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* This test checks the basic functionality of ECDSA. It simply tries to generate a key, sign and
|
|
* verify a message for a given, algorithm and curve.
|
|
*
|
|
* @param algorithm the algorithm to test (e.g. "SHA256WithECDSA")
|
|
* @param curve the curve to test (e.g. "secp256r1")
|
|
* @return whether the algorithm and curve are supported.
|
|
* @throws Exception if an unexpected error occurred.
|
|
*/
|
|
boolean testParameters(String algorithm, String curve) throws Exception {
|
|
String message = "123400";
|
|
|
|
KeyPairGenerator keyGen = KeyPairGenerator.getInstance("EC");
|
|
ECGenParameterSpec ecSpec = new ECGenParameterSpec(curve);
|
|
KeyPair keyPair;
|
|
try {
|
|
keyGen.initialize(ecSpec);
|
|
keyPair = keyGen.generateKeyPair();
|
|
} catch (InvalidAlgorithmParameterException ex) {
|
|
// The curve is not supported.
|
|
// The documentation does not specify whether the method initialize
|
|
// has to reject unsupported curves or if only generateKeyPair checks
|
|
// whether the curve is supported.
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
ECPublicKey pub = (ECPublicKey) keyPair.getPublic();
|
|
ECPrivateKey priv = (ECPrivateKey) keyPair.getPrivate();
|
|
|
|
// Print the parameters.
|
|
System.out.println("Parameters for curve:" + curve);
|
|
EcUtil.printParameters(pub.getParams());
|
|
|
|
Signature signer;
|
|
Signature verifier;
|
|
try {
|
|
signer = Signature.getInstance(algorithm);
|
|
verifier = Signature.getInstance(algorithm);
|
|
} catch (NoSuchAlgorithmException ex) {
|
|
// The algorithm is not supported.
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
// Both algorithm and curve are supported.
|
|
// Hence, we expect that signing and verifying properly works.
|
|
byte[] messageBytes = message.getBytes("UTF-8");
|
|
signer.initSign(priv);
|
|
signer.update(messageBytes);
|
|
byte[] signature = signer.sign();
|
|
verifier.initVerify(pub);
|
|
verifier.update(messageBytes);
|
|
assertTrue(verifier.verify(signature));
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* This test checks the basic functionality of ECDSA. This mainly checks that the provider follows
|
|
* the JCA interface.
|
|
*/
|
|
@Test
|
|
public void testBasic() throws Exception {
|
|
String algorithm = "SHA256WithECDSA";
|
|
String curve = "secp256r1";
|
|
assertTrue(testParameters(algorithm, curve));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Checks whether the one time key k in ECDSA is biased. */
|
|
public void testBias(String algorithm, String curve, ECParameterSpec ecParams) throws Exception {
|
|
KeyPairGenerator keyGen = KeyPairGenerator.getInstance("EC");
|
|
try {
|
|
keyGen.initialize(ecParams);
|
|
} catch (InvalidAlgorithmParameterException ex) {
|
|
System.out.println("This provider does not support curve:" + curve);
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
KeyPair keyPair = keyGen.generateKeyPair();
|
|
ECPrivateKey priv = (ECPrivateKey) keyPair.getPrivate();
|
|
// If we throw a fair coin tests times then the probability that
|
|
// either heads or tails appears less than mincount is less than 2^{-32}.
|
|
// Therefore the test below is not expected to fail unless the generation
|
|
// of the one time keys is indeed biased.
|
|
final int tests = 1024;
|
|
final int mincount = 410;
|
|
|
|
String hashAlgorithm = getHashAlgorithm(algorithm);
|
|
String message = "Hello";
|
|
byte[] messageBytes = message.getBytes("UTF-8");
|
|
byte[] digest = MessageDigest.getInstance(hashAlgorithm).digest(messageBytes);
|
|
|
|
// TODO(bleichen): Truncate the digest if the digest size is larger than the
|
|
// curve size.
|
|
BigInteger h = new BigInteger(1, digest);
|
|
BigInteger q = priv.getParams().getOrder();
|
|
BigInteger qHalf = q.shiftRight(1);
|
|
|
|
Signature signer = Signature.getInstance(algorithm);
|
|
signer.initSign(priv);
|
|
BigInteger[] kList = new BigInteger[tests];
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < tests; i++) {
|
|
signer.update(messageBytes);
|
|
byte[] signature = signer.sign();
|
|
kList[i] = extractK(signature, h, priv);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Checks whether the most significant bits and the least significant bits
|
|
// of the value k are unbiased.
|
|
int countMsb = 0; // count the number of k's with lsb set
|
|
int countLsb = 0; // count the number of k's with msb set
|
|
for (BigInteger k : kList) {
|
|
if (k.testBit(0)) {
|
|
countLsb++;
|
|
}
|
|
if (k.compareTo(qHalf) == 1) {
|
|
countMsb++;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if (countLsb < mincount || countLsb > tests - mincount) {
|
|
fail("Bias detected in the least significant bit of k:" + countLsb);
|
|
}
|
|
if (countMsb < mincount || countMsb > tests - mincount) {
|
|
fail("Bias detected in the most significant bit of k:" + countMsb);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// One situation where the bits above are not biased even if k itself is
|
|
// badly distributed is the case where the signer replaces s by
|
|
// min(s, q - s). Such a replacement is sometimes done to avoid signature
|
|
// malleability of ECDSA.
|
|
// Breitner and Heninger describe such cases in the paper
|
|
// "Biased Nonce Sense: Lattice Attacks against Weak ECDSA Signatures in Cryptocurrencies",
|
|
// https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/023.pdf
|
|
// The following tests should catch the bugs described in this paper.
|
|
// The threshold below has been chosen to give false positives with probability < 2^{-32}.
|
|
double threshold = 5;
|
|
|
|
// This test detects for example the case when either k or q-k is small.
|
|
double bias1 = bias(kList, q, BigInteger.ONE);
|
|
if (bias1 > threshold) {
|
|
fail("Bias for k detected. bias1 = " + bias1);
|
|
}
|
|
// Same as above but shifing by one bit.
|
|
double bias2 = bias(kList, q, BigInteger.valueOf(2));
|
|
if (bias2 > threshold) {
|
|
fail("Bias for k detected. bias2 = " + bias2);
|
|
}
|
|
double bias3 = bias(kList, q, qHalf);
|
|
if (bias3 > threshold) {
|
|
fail("Bias for k detected. bias3 = " + bias3);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@SlowTest(
|
|
providers = {
|
|
ProviderType.BOUNCY_CASTLE,
|
|
ProviderType.CONSCRYPT,
|
|
ProviderType.OPENJDK,
|
|
ProviderType.SPONGY_CASTLE
|
|
}
|
|
)
|
|
@Test
|
|
public void testBiasAll() throws Exception {
|
|
testBias("SHA256WithECDSA", "secp256r1", EcUtil.getNistP256Params());
|
|
testBias("SHA224WithECDSA", "secp224r1", EcUtil.getNistP224Params());
|
|
testBias("SHA384WithECDSA", "secp384r1", EcUtil.getNistP384Params());
|
|
testBias("SHA512WithECDSA", "secp521r1", EcUtil.getNistP521Params());
|
|
testBias("SHA256WithECDSA", "brainpoolP256r1", EcUtil.getBrainpoolP256r1Params());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Tests for a potential timing attack. This test checks if there is a correlation between the
|
|
* timing of signature generation and the size of the one-time key k. This is for example the case
|
|
* if a double and add method is used for the point multiplication. The test fails if such a
|
|
* correlation can be shown with high confidence. Further analysis will be necessary to determine
|
|
* how easy it is to exploit the bias in a timing attack.
|
|
*/
|
|
// TODO(bleichen): Determine if there are exploitable providers.
|
|
//
|
|
// SunEC currently fails this test. Since ECDSA typically is used with EC groups whose order
|
|
// is 224 bits or larger, it is unclear whether the same attacks that apply to DSA are practical.
|
|
//
|
|
// The ECDSA implementation in BouncyCastle leaks information about k through timing too.
|
|
// The test has not been optimized to detect this bias. It would require about 5'000'000 samples,
|
|
// which is too much for a simple unit test.
|
|
//
|
|
// BouncyCastle uses FixedPointCombMultiplier for ECDSA. This is a method using
|
|
// precomputation. The implementation is not constant time, since the precomputation table
|
|
// contains the point at infinity and adding this point is faster than ordinary point additions.
|
|
// The timing leak only has a small correlation to the size of k and at the moment it is is very
|
|
// unclear if the can be exploited. (Randomizing the precomputation table by adding the same
|
|
// random point to each element in the table and precomputing the necessary offset to undo the
|
|
// precomputation seems much easier than analyzing this.)
|
|
public void testTiming(String algorithm, String curve, ECParameterSpec ecParams)
|
|
throws Exception {
|
|
ThreadMXBean bean = ManagementFactory.getThreadMXBean();
|
|
if (!bean.isCurrentThreadCpuTimeSupported()) {
|
|
System.out.println("getCurrentThreadCpuTime is not supported. Skipping");
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
KeyPairGenerator keyGen = KeyPairGenerator.getInstance("EC");
|
|
try {
|
|
keyGen.initialize(ecParams);
|
|
} catch (InvalidAlgorithmParameterException ex) {
|
|
System.out.println("This provider does not support curve:" + curve);
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
KeyPair keyPair = keyGen.generateKeyPair();
|
|
ECPrivateKey priv = (ECPrivateKey) keyPair.getPrivate();
|
|
|
|
String message = "Hello";
|
|
String hashAlgorithm = getHashAlgorithm(algorithm);
|
|
byte[] messageBytes = message.getBytes("UTF-8");
|
|
byte[] digest = MessageDigest.getInstance(hashAlgorithm).digest(messageBytes);
|
|
BigInteger h = new BigInteger(1, digest);
|
|
Signature signer = Signature.getInstance(algorithm);
|
|
signer.initSign(priv);
|
|
// The number of samples used for the test. This number is a bit low.
|
|
// I.e. it just barely detects that SunEC leaks information about the size of k.
|
|
int samples = 50000;
|
|
long[] timing = new long[samples];
|
|
BigInteger[] k = new BigInteger[samples];
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < samples; i++) {
|
|
long start = bean.getCurrentThreadCpuTime();
|
|
signer.update(messageBytes);
|
|
byte[] signature = signer.sign();
|
|
timing[i] = bean.getCurrentThreadCpuTime() - start;
|
|
k[i] = extractK(signature, h, priv);
|
|
}
|
|
long[] sorted = Arrays.copyOf(timing, timing.length);
|
|
Arrays.sort(sorted);
|
|
double n = priv.getParams().getOrder().doubleValue();
|
|
double expectedAverage = n / 2;
|
|
double maxSigma = 0;
|
|
System.out.println("testTiming algorithm:" + algorithm);
|
|
for (int idx = samples - 1; idx > 10; idx /= 2) {
|
|
long cutoff = sorted[idx];
|
|
int count = 0;
|
|
BigInteger total = BigInteger.ZERO;
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < samples; i++) {
|
|
if (timing[i] <= cutoff) {
|
|
total = total.add(k[i]);
|
|
count += 1;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
double expectedStdDev = n / Math.sqrt(12 * count);
|
|
double average = total.doubleValue() / count;
|
|
// Number of standard deviations that the average is away from
|
|
// the expected value:
|
|
double sigmas = Math.abs(expectedAverage - average) / expectedStdDev;
|
|
if (sigmas > maxSigma) {
|
|
maxSigma = sigmas;
|
|
}
|
|
System.out.println(
|
|
"count:"
|
|
+ count
|
|
+ " cutoff:"
|
|
+ cutoff
|
|
+ " relative average:"
|
|
+ (average / expectedAverage)
|
|
+ " sigmas:"
|
|
+ sigmas);
|
|
}
|
|
// Checks if the signatures with a small timing have a biased k.
|
|
// We use 7 standard deviations, so that the probability of a false positive is smaller
|
|
// than 10^{-10}.
|
|
if (maxSigma >= 7) {
|
|
fail("Signatures with short timing have a biased k");
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@SlowTest(
|
|
providers = {
|
|
ProviderType.BOUNCY_CASTLE,
|
|
ProviderType.CONSCRYPT,
|
|
ProviderType.OPENJDK,
|
|
ProviderType.SPONGY_CASTLE
|
|
}
|
|
)
|
|
@Test
|
|
public void testTimingAll() throws Exception {
|
|
testTiming("SHA256WithECDSA", "secp256r1", EcUtil.getNistP256Params());
|
|
// TODO(bleichen): crypto libraries sometimes use optimized code for curves that are frequently
|
|
// used. Hence it would make sense to test distinct curves. But at the moment testing many
|
|
// curves is not practical since one test alone is already quite time consuming.
|
|
// testTiming("SHA224WithECDSA", "secp224r1", EcUtil.getNistP224Params());
|
|
// testTiming("SHA384WithECDSA", "secp384r1", EcUtil.getNistP384Params());
|
|
// testTiming("SHA512WithECDSA", "secp521r1", EcUtil.getNistP521Params());
|
|
// testTiming("SHA256WithECDSA", "brainpoolP256r1", EcUtil.getBrainpoolP256r1Params());
|
|
}
|
|
}
|