Linux 6.1 introduced `MADV_COLLAPSE` flag to perform a best-effort
synchronous collapse of the native pages mapped by the memory range into
transparent huge pages.
Synchronous hugification might be beneficial for at least two reasons:
we are not relying on khugepaged anymore and get an instant feedback if
range wasn't hugified.
If `hpa_hugify_sync` option is on, we'll try to perform synchronously
collapse and if it wasn't successful, we'll fallback to asynchronous
behaviour.
Option `experimental_hpa_strict_min_purge_interval` was expected to be
temporary to simplify rollout of a bugfix. Now, when bugfix rollout is
complete it is safe to remove this option.
Option `experimental_hpa_max_purge_nhp` introduced for backward
compatibility reasons: to make it possible to have behaviour similar
to buggy `hpa_strict_min_purge_interval` implementation.
When `experimental_hpa_max_purge_nhp` is set to -1, there is no limit
to number of slabs we'll purge on each iteration. Otherwise, we'll purge
no more than `experimental_hpa_max_purge_nhp` hugepages (slabs). This in
turn means we might not purge enough dirty pages to satisfy
`hpa_dirty_mult` requirement.
Combination of `hpa_dirty_mult`, `experimental_hpa_max_purge_nhp` and
`hpa_strict_min_purge_interval` options allows us to have steady rate of
pages returned back to the system. This provides a strickier latency
guarantees as number of `madvise` calls is bounded (and hence number of
TLB shootdowns is limited) in exchange to weaker memory usage
guarantees.
We update `shard->last_purge` on each call of `hpa_try_purge` if we
purged something. This means, when `hpa_strict_min_purge_interval`
option is set only one slab will be purged, because on the next
call condition for too frequent purge protection
`since_last_purge_ms < shard->opts.min_purge_interval_ms` will always
be true. This is not an intended behaviour.
Instead, we need to check `min_purge_interval_ms` once and purge as many
pages as needed to satisfy requirements for `hpa_dirty_mult` option.
Make possible to count number of actions performed in unit tests (purge,
hugify, dehugify) instead of binary: called/not called. Extended current
unit tests with cases where we need to purge more than one page for a
purge phase.
One of the condition to start purging is `hpa_hugify_blocked_by_ndirty`
function call returns true. This can happen in cases where we have no
dirty memory for this shard at all. In this case purging loop will be an
infinite loop.
`hpa_hugify_blocked_by_ndirty` was introduced at 0f6c420, but at that
time purging loop has different form and additional `break` was not
required. Purging loop form was re-written at 6630c5989, but additional
exit condition wasn't added there at the time.
Repo code was shared by Patrik Dokoupil at [1], I stripped it down to
minimum to reproduce issue in jemalloc unit tests.
[1]: https://github.com/jemalloc/jemalloc/pull/2533
it's within the huge page size. These requests do not concern internal
fragmentation with huge pages, since the entire range is expected to be
accessed.
For better or worse, Jemalloc has a significant number of global
variables. Making all eligible global variables `static` and/or `const`
at least makes it slightly easier to reason about them, as these
qualifications communicate to the programmer restrictions on their use
without having to `grep` the whole codebase.
nstime module guarantees monotonic clock update within a single nstime_t. This
means, if two separate nstime_t variables are read and updated separately,
nstime_subtract between them may result in underflow. Fixed by switching to the
time since utility provided by nstime.
Currently used only for guarding purposes, the hint is used to determine
if the allocation is supposed to be frequently reused. For example, it
might urge the allocator to ensure the allocation is cached.
In order for nstime_update to handle non-monotonic clocks, it requires the input
nstime to be initialized -- when reading for the first time, zero init has to be
done. Otherwise random stack value may be seen as clocks and returned.
As the code evolves, some code paths that have previously assigned
deferred_work_generated may cease being reached. This would leave the value
uninitialized. This change initializes the value for safety.
Adding guarded extents, which are regular extents surrounded by guard pages
(mprotected). To reduce syscalls, small guarded extents are cached as a
separate eset in ecache, and decay through the dirty / muzzy / retained pipeline
as usual.
This mallctl accepts an arena_config_t structure which
can be used to customize the behavior of the arena.
Right now it contains extent_hooks and a new option,
metadata_use_hooks, which controls whether the extent
hooks are also used for metadata allocation.
The medata_use_hooks option has two main use cases:
1. In heterogeneous memory systems, to avoid metadata
being placed on potentially slower memory.
2. Avoiding virtual memory from being leaked as a result
of metadata allocation failure originating in an extent hook.
This change allows every allocator conforming to PAI communicate that it
deferred some work for the future. Without it if a background thread goes into
indefinite sleep, there is no way to notify it about upcoming deferred work.
We wait a while after deciding a huge extent should get hugified to see if it
gets purged before long. This avoids hugifying extents that might shortly get
dehugified for purging.
Rename and use the hpa_dehugification_threshold option support code for this,
since it's now ignored.
Currently that just means max_alloc, but we're about to add more. While we're
touching these lines anyways, tweak things to be more in line with testing.
Using an edata_t both for hugepages and the allocations within those hugepages
was convenient at first, but has outlived its usefulness. Representing
hugepages explicitly, with their own data structure, will make future
development easier.
Dmitry Ilvokhin